Tesla FSD Under Investigation: What That Means for Buyers and Resale Value

Hook: If you’re buying or selling a Tesla in 2026, the FSD investigation could cost — literally

Worried that the advertised magic of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) might be a liability? You’re not alone. Recent regulator activity has exposed real questions about FSD’s behavior — including reports of Teslas running red lights and ignoring traffic — and that uncertainty is already reshaping buyer confidence, insurance pricing, and what your car will be worth in the used market.

Top line — what the NHTSA probe means now

In late 2025 the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) opened a preliminary investigation into Tesla’s partially automated driving software after more than 60 complaints alleged FSD ignored red lights or drove into oncoming traffic. The regulator has asked Tesla for extensive information — from a list of U.S. Teslas with FSD to cumulative usage data and all customer complaints and incident reports — and granted the company a narrow extension to respond. See parallels with other high-profile incident postmortems here.

Why this matters to owners and buyers in 2026:

• Regulatory risk: A finding of a safety defect could trigger recalls, mandated software changes, or stricter deployment rules.
• Insurance impact: Insurers are reassessing how they underwrite ADAS-equipped cars; premiums or endorsements can change quickly.
• Buyer confidence: Prospective buyers may discount FSD-equipped listings or avoid them altogether until the legal and safety picture clears.
• Resale value: Vehicles tied to high-profile investigations typically see increased volatility in resale prices — the direction depends on outcomes and remediation.

What NHTSA asked Tesla — the depth of the probe

The NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation requested comprehensive data, including VIN-level details of Teslas sold or leased in the U.S., whether vehicles had FSD, cumulative usage statistics, and a list of all complaints, incidents and lawsuits related to FSD’s failure to obey traffic controls. The agency’s scope reflects concern not just about isolated bugs but about systemic behavior patterns across vehicle fleets.

"NHTSA requested a list of every Tesla produced and sold or leased in the United States, including whether or not that car had FSD and which version."

That level of scrutiny is significant: it goes beyond individual incidents and aims to identify trends that could indicate a design or systems-level safety problem. Handling and analyzing VIN-level and telemetry data requires robust data tooling — see a technical perspective on handling large scraped and telemetry datasets here.

How this changes the risk picture for buyers in 2026

When you shop for a used Tesla today, you’re now buying two things: the physical car and its embedded software history.

1. Buyer confidence and buying behavior

Expect more buyers to be cautious. Some specific behavior we’re seeing in 2026:

• Higher demand for vehicles without FSD or with only basic Autopilot.
• Buyers requesting VIN-level documentation of software versions and a history of software updates.
• Increased use of third-party pre-purchase inspections that explicitly test ADAS behavior.

2. What to ask sellers or dealerships

Actionable checks before you buy:

• Ask for the VIN and whether FSD was purchased or activated. Confirm which FSD software versions were installed.
• Request a record of software update history and any dealer or OTA patches applied for safety issues.
• Confirm transferability — is the FSD license transferable or tied to an account? (Tesla’s policies have changed in past years.)
• Get an independent ADAS evaluation that observes intersection behavior, lane-keep, and emergency braking performance.

3. Practical risk-reduction tactics for buyers

1. Shop for vehicles with documented, recent OTA updates that address safety bugs.
2. Compare insurance quotes with and without FSD enabled — ask carriers whether they surcharge for FSD features.
3. Negotiate price downward for FSD-equipped cars until regulatory and legal clarity improves.
4. Consider buying an identical model without the software bundle if you value predictability in resale and insurance.

Insurance: how carriers are responding

Insurance is where regulatory news meets hard cash. In 2026 we’re already seeing three trends:

• Re-underwriting of ADAS risk: Insurers are repricing exposure to partial automation. Some carriers that previously offered discounts for ADAS features are pausing those programs until more safety data arrives.
• Usage-based and event-based adjustments: Telematics that track driver engagement and ADAS usage are increasingly used to set premiums or apply surcharges after incidents. Integrating partner telematics and streamlining the data flow is a growing focus—see approaches to reducing partner onboarding friction with AI.
• Endorsements and exclusions: Some policies now include endorsements specifically for advanced driver aids; others carve out software failure claims or limit liability for autonomous functions.

Actionable insurance steps:

• Get multiple quotes and specifically ask about FSD — not all agents understand the nuances.
• Request written statements on how a carrier treats software-caused incidents and whether you’d face higher deductibles or denials for crashes while FSD was active.
• Consider usage-based insurance programs that reward careful, supervised use of ADAS features.

Legal exposure and software liability

One of the biggest shifts since 2024–2026 is that software problems are no longer treated as theoretical legal risks — they’re active litigation arenas. Plaintiffs’ lawyers have filed class actions and personal injury suits alleging that automated features like Autopilot and FSD misguide drivers or fail to respond correctly to traffic controls.

Who could be liable?

• Manufacturers: If a defect in design, training data, or deployment leads to unsafe behavior, OEMs can face product liability claims.
• Drivers: Because current systems (FSD as implemented today) require human supervision, drivers can still bear fault if they were inattentive or improperly relied on the system.
• Software suppliers: Third-party component or software vendors can be pulled into litigation if their modules contributed to a failure. Treat third-party vendors like any other software partner — assess their delivery and update practices; see a vendor-tooling analogy in the localization stack toolkit review.

Regulatory and legislative changes to watch in 2026

• Federal and state lawmakers are debating clearer software-liability frameworks that could shift more responsibility to manufacturers for the safety of deployed code.
• NHTSA and new federal guidance push for more transparent reporting of ADAS performance metrics — a likely outcome would be mandatory incident logging similar to aviation's black-box concept.
• Some states are considering rules restricting how automakers market automation levels to consumers to prevent over-reliance.

Resale value: short-term shock, long-term depends on outcome

The used-car market reacts quickly to high-profile safety questions. Expect the following dynamics in 2026:

Immediate effects

• A discount on listings that advertise FSD prominently; buyers seek bargains or avoid FSD entirely.
• Increased listing times for FSD-equipped vehicles compared with similar non-FSD models.
• Higher variance in resale prices — cars with clean service histories and documented safe OTA patches may hold value better.

Medium- to long-term scenarios

The longer-term resale trajectory hinges on two primary outcomes:

1. If regulators find systemic defects and mandate major software fixes and vehicle recalls, resale values could dip further initially. However, a comprehensive, transparent fix could restore confidence and shrink the depreciation premium over 12–24 months.
2. If investigations clear current systems or improvements are incremental and well-documented, the market may price in a temporary uncertainty premium that fades as OTA updates and third-party vetting confirm safety gains.

How sellers can protect value

• Provide full disclosure of FSD purchase/activation status and detailed software update logs.
• Retain and share records of any dealer or Tesla service actions that remedied safety-related issues.
• Offer short-term guarantees or return windows where feasible, to reassure buyers about software behavior.

Practical checklist: Buying, owning, or selling a Tesla with FSD in 2026

Use this actionable checklist to minimize legal, financial, and safety risk.

For buyers

• Get the VIN and confirm whether FSD was purchased/activated and which software versions were used.
• Request a copy of all OTA update logs and incident reports the seller has on file.
• Obtain multiple insurance quotes and clarify how an insurer treats FSD-involved incidents.
• Consider an independent ADAS-specific inspection and a road test focusing on intersections and complex traffic scenarios.
• Negotiate price or seller concessions if FSD is included; consider turning FSD off until you’re confident in its safety record.

For current owners

• Keep meticulous records: software update receipts, owner logs of FSD use, and any complaints filed with Tesla or regulators.
• Disable FSD in areas where you’re uncomfortable with its performance; supervise the system actively when it’s engaged.
• Notify your insurer of any system changes and ask whether installing additional driver-monitoring telematics reduces rate risk.
• Document any unexpected behavior and report it to NHTSA or your state DMV — reporting helps regulators identify trends faster.

For sellers

• Disclose FSD status and provide full software-history documentation to prospective buyers.
• Be prepared to offer a price offset or temporary warranty for software-related issues in competitive markets.
• Consider marketing the car with FSD disabled until you can show a clean update and incident history.

Future predictions — how the FSD narrative will evolve through 2026 and beyond

Based on recent regulatory patterns and industry moves, here are likely developments over the next 12–24 months:

• More transparency: Regulators and consumer groups will push for standardized reporting of ADAS incidents and software versions tied to VINs.
• Software safety frameworks: Expect federal guidelines that treat safety-critical driving software similarly to medical or aviation software — stronger verification, logging, and traceability. See product-update strategies for keeping legacy behavior predictable here.
• Insurance innovation: New policy products that explicitly cover (or exclude) autonomous-driving software failures, with premiums based on real-world ADAS telemetry.
• Market segmentation: Vehicles will be more clearly segmented by ADAS maturity and documentation: certified-safe, updated, or legacy-risk — with price differences to match.
• Legal clarity: If legislatures adopt clearer software-liability rules, responsibility may shift more to manufacturers — but litigation will still be complex and outcome-dependent.

Case study (realistic scenario): Jane’s purchase choice in 2026

Jane shopped for a lightly used Tesla Model 3 with FSD listed at a modest premium. She followed the checklist: asked for the VIN, verified a series of OTA patches addressing intersection behavior, got a written insurance quote that included an ADAS endorsement, and had an independent ADAS road evaluation. Because the seller provided a recent service bulletin showing a safety-related patch and agreed to a price reduction and a 30-day returns window, Jane bought the car and kept FSD disabled while driving in urban environments for the first three months. Her approach illustrates practical risk management: documentation, insurer clarity, negotiation, and cautious use.

Bottom line — what to do this quarter

If you’re thinking about buying, selling, or keeping a Tesla with FSD in 2026, take action now:

• Document everything (VIN, FSD status, update history).
• Talk to at least two insurers about how they price FSD-related risk.
• Negotiate price or seller warranties; avoid paying a premium for unproven safety features.
• Monitor NHTSA findings and Tesla’s response — a transparent, verifiable fix can restore value quickly. Consider resale tactics such as micro-auctions and live-listings if you need faster turnover.

Trust, transparency, and your wallet

The NHTSA probe is less a verdict than a spotlight. It exposes gaps in understanding how advanced driver assistance systems behave at scale and pressures manufacturers, insurers, and regulators to produce clearer safety data. For buyers and sellers, that means short-term volatility and the need for documentation-driven decisions. For the savvy consumer, the combination of careful vetting, insurer dialogue, and negotiation can protect both safety and resale value.

Call to action

Want tailored advice for a specific Tesla listing or need a pre-purchase ADAS checklist you can print and bring to test drives? Contact us for a free consultation — we’ll review VINs, help you get insurer quotes, and outline negotiation points that protect your wallet and your safety. Don’t buy blind; get the facts before you sign.

Related Reading

• How to Keep Legacy Features When Shipping New Maps: Product Update Strategies
• Micro‑Auctions and Live‑Listing Tactics for Used Cars in 2026
• Postmortem: What the Friday X/Cloudflare/AWS Outages Teach Incident Responders
• Advanced Strategy: Reducing Partner Onboarding Friction with AI
• Wearable Data for Recovery: A Therapist’s Guide to Interpreting Sleep Sensors Post-Massage
• Heirlooms in the Digital Age: Cataloguing Your Jewelry for Insurance and Legacy
• Insuring a 50 mph E‑Scooter: Policies, Costs and What’s Typically Excluded
• Segway Navimow vs Greenworks Riding Mower: Which Deal Is the Best Value?
• Best Phone Plans for Road-Trippers: Stay Connected on Long Drives Without Breaking the Bank